December
17, 2009
Cobell lawsuit settlement
will affect Montana tribes
By
Lailani Upham
WASHINGTON, D.C. —
It’s been a week and half since the settlement agreement was announced
between Elouise Cobell, lead plaintiff in the Cobell v. Salazar class
action lawsuit over federal mismanagement of individual Indian trust
fund accounts.
The settlement agreement totaled about $3.4
billion, of that,
$1.4 million would be disbursed to IIM account holders. The remaining
$2 billion would be used to consolidate tribal lands by purchasing
“fractionated” land interests.
Before dispersing money, the settlement agreement
must be
approved by Congress and a federal district court, according to Senator
Byron Dorgan (D-ND) Chairman of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs.
“Ultimately, Congress must approve implementation of this settlement. I
am committed to ensuring that the settlement is fair and equitable, and
to Congress considering it expeditiously,” Dorgan said during a press
release last week.
According to a report in the Billings Gazette,
Montana tribal
members will receive about $27 million from the proposed settlement.
Public Affairs Specialist for the Office of the
Special
Trustee, Debby Pafel explained, “There are two classes created in the
settlement agreement. A person could belong to both classes and,
therefore, receive $1,000 as a member of the Historical Accounting
Class, and $500 as a member of the Trust Administration Class.”
According to definitions in the settlement
agreement, members
in the first category, the historical accounting class, include anyone
who had an IIM account between Oct. 25, 1994, and Sept. 30, 2009, and
anyone whose account has at least one cash transaction at any time.
The Trust Administration class defines it as,
anyone who has or
had an IIM account in the Electronic Ledger Era starting in 1985, or
anyone who can demonstrate ownership interest in trust land, regardless
of the existence of an IIM and regardless of the proceeds, if any, from
the land. Account holders in this category will receive $500.
Not all tribal members have IIM accounts or
qualifying land
interests, but thousands on Montana’s seven reservations will benefit.
After Congress approves implementation of the
settlement,
notifications to the class members will be sent out and the settlement
funds will be deposited with the trust department of a private bank
selected by the plaintiffs based on criteria set forth in the
Agreement.
According to the Department of Interior, the
notifications will
go out to several hundred thousand class members stating: an
explanation, a description of the settlement, procedures for
distributing the settlement fund, the amount of attorneys’ fees, the
manner in which a person can opt out of the settlement, and contact
information for inquiries. The members will have time to review and
understand the settlement, and have 60 days to decide whether to opt
out of the settlement. The District Court Judge will then determine if
the notice and opt out process was fair. After that, the judge reviews
the entire process. Upon his approval, the settlement becomes
effective.
According to DOI information gathered by the
Gazette the
following are breakdowns of the number of IIM accounts within Montana
tribes: the Blackfeet Nation have a total of 3,721 accounts; the Crow
have 3,089; the Fort Peck Tribes have 3,026; the Salish and Kootenai
Confederation have 2,606; the Northern Cheyenne have 1,629; the Fort
Belknap reservation has 1,485; and the Chippewa Cree Tribe has 350.
Senator Max Baucus stated after the announced
settlement
agreement, “I’m happy that there has been an agreement reached on the
Cobell lawsuit. Montana Indians have been waiting for years for this.
For too long, Native Americans have been denied fair and full
compensation for the timber production, leasing of mineral rights, and
grazing on tribal trust lands. While Congress must still pass
authorizing legislation to enact the settlement, this is a critical
first step. I applaud Elouise Cobell for her unwavering fight to
correct the unfair accounting practices that negatively affected
Indians with Individual Indian Money accounts for decades.”
Although the settlement is good news for the
tribes across the
nation, the “fractionation” of land interests that succeeded through
generations dating back to 1887 is one of the root causes of the
lawsuit because it made accounting for land interests nearly
impossible.
The Dawes Act of 1887 allotted individual tribal
members lands on their reservation that were divided into small
parcels. When an original allottee died, usually without a will, his or
her land was divided among the heirs and through several generations;
up until today, fractionation has rendered many of those interests so
small that it became a management nightmare rendering the value of the
land practically worthless, and the problem grew whenever land was
passed on.
The settlement establishes a $2 billion fund to
provide
individual tribal members the opportunity to receive cash payments for
divided land interest and free up land for tribal communities on a
voluntary buy-back and consolidation of fractionated land interests.
The
reduction in individual trust accounts enables the U.S to greatly
reduce on-going administrative expenses and future accounting-related
disputes.
Through the settlement, the Interior Department
will set aside
up $60 million of the interests into a college and vocational school
scholarship fund for American Indian students.
Senator Jon Tester, a member of the Senate Indian
Affairs
Committee stated in response to the Cobell class-action lawsuit
settlement, “This is milestone for all folks in Indian Country, and I’m
proud of the Montanans who made history by working together for years
to reach this agreement. We still have a long way to go, but as a
member of the Indian Affairs Committee, I’ll keep working with folks on
the ground to empower Montana’s sovereign tribes and make sure the
federal government meets its trust responsibilities.”
Elouise Cobell, an enrolled member of the
Blackfeet Tribe filed
the lawsuit 13 years ago alleging that the federal government
mismanaged trust funds for hundreds of thousands of American Indians.
Share
|